{"id":83994,"date":"2026-09-17T22:20:55","date_gmt":"2026-09-18T05:20:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/?p=83994"},"modified":"2026-09-17T22:20:55","modified_gmt":"2026-09-18T05:20:55","slug":"california-sues-trump-administration-on-new-public-charge-rule","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/?p=83994","title":{"rendered":"California Sues Trump Administration on New Public Charge Rule"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
By<\/span>Sunita Sohrabji<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

California Attorney General Rob Bonta led a 22-state coalition which filed a lawsuit Sept. 14 aiming to block the Trump Administration\u2019s new public charge rule.<\/p>\n

The Administration is set to begin implementing the new rule Sept. 18, dramatically expanding the ability of immigration officials to use participation in means-tested public benefits programs as grounds to deny lawful permanent residency. Even before the new rule drops, thousands of Californians \u2014 especially those in mixed status families \u2014 have disenrolled from benefits for which they are eligible.<\/p>\n

\u201cNo family should have to choose between accessing healthcare\u00a0and nutrition assistance\u00a0today\u00a0\u2014 or protecting their pathway to\u00a0a green card\u00a0tomorrow,\u201d\u00a0 said Bonta in a press statement announcing the\u00a0lawsuit<\/a>. \u201cThe Trump Administration is seeking to rewrite more than 100 years of law with its expansive new definition of who is considered a \u2018public charge.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201dIn doing so, it is providing individual immigration officers with the discretion and power to punish families for lawfully accessing certain public benefits programs during short-term periods of need. This Administration\u2019s cruelty continues to know no bounds,\u201d stated Bonta.<\/p>\n

\u2018Arbitrary and capricious\u2019<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/picture>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

Ariel Brown, Attorney, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, gives an overview of the immigrant groups who are not subject to the new public charge rules and test.<\/em><\/p>\n

Santa Clara and San Francisco counties have also joined the lawsuit. New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul joined Bonta in leading the multi-state coalition. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The litigants characterize the new public charge rule as \u201carbitrary and capricious.\u201d<\/p>\n

At an\u00a0American Community Media news briefing<\/a>\u00a0Sept. 9, state officials, community organizations and immigration rights activists discussed the stake for Californians as the public charge rule is implemented. \u201cThe public charge test is going to be much more subjective,\u201d said Ariel Brown, an attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. \u201cIt creates confusion and a chilling effect.\u201d<\/p>\n

The rule does not apply to everyone seeking to change immigration status to permanent residency, said Brown. Refugees, asylees and certain humanitarian immigrants are among those exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility. Lawful permanent residents applying for citizenship also generally are not subject to the test. And people applying to renew their green cards are also not subject to public charge.<\/p>\n

Mixed status families<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/picture>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

Sarah Dar, Vice President of Policy and Advocacy at The Children\u2019s Partnership, shares data on children born to immigrant families and explains how the new public charge rule could push them into poverty and deprivation.<\/em><\/p>\n

But for families with a green-card application pending or planned, the stakes can be substantial, said Brown. She encouraged prospective applicants seeking a green card to file before Sept. 17, since the rule will not be applied retroactively.<\/p>\n

Undocumented people who do not currently have a pathway to legal permanent residency are unlikely to be impacted, said Sarah Dar, Vice President of Policy and Advocacy at The Children\u2019s Partnership. All speakers stressed that undocumented immigrants are ineligible for federal public benefits.<\/p>\n

More than one million California children\u00a0are estimated to have one undocumented parent, and over one in four children in immigrant families are US citizens with only one non-US citizen parents, noted Dar.<\/p>\n

The new regulation allows immigration officials to consider if anyone in a household has accessed public benefits, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the Children\u2019s Health Insurance Program, Medicaid, Section 8 housing support, and other safety nets.<\/p>\n

\u201cSo for a lot of parents and families, the huge concern, is, \u2018I have a US citizen child or a child that\u2019s eligible for a means-tested service, and I\u2019m concerned that\u00a0their use of the benefit is going to impact my immigration case,\u201d said Dar.<\/p>\n

Missing school<\/h2>\n

According to an April 2026\u00a0report<\/a>\u00a0released by Stanford University, more than two in three California parents surveyed (67%) were concerned that immigration enforcement activities could affect their family\u2019s participation in child care. The data were similar among immigrant parents (71%) and non-immigrant parents (64%).<\/p>\n

About one in ten California parents surveyed (9%) said their child missed at least one day of child care in the past month due to concerns about immigration enforcement in their community, according to the report.<\/p>\n

Brown noted that a child\u2019s use of benefits cannot alone determine public charge ineligibility for a green card. But it can be used as one of several factors in a more comprehensive picture.<\/p>\n

A previous version of the public charge rule prohibited the Department of Homeland Security officers from looking at benefits used by children or other family members who were not applying for change of immigration status. That protection is now gone, said Adriana Cadena, executive director of the Protecting Immigrant Families Coalition.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/picture>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

Daniel Torres, Chief Equity Officer & Special Counsel, California Health & Human Services Agency, discusses the consequences of the new public charge rule, which include discouraging people from applying for public benefits and reduced transparency in Green Card denials.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u2018Immigration Officer Bias\u2019<\/h2>\n

\u201cThis second Trump administration has again weaponized public charge\u00a0rule to destabilize immigrant families and to corner them and their US-born children into\u00a0deprivation,\u201d said Cadena. \u201cIt opens the door for the green card process to be based on partisan politics and even personal bias by DHS officers.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe real threat that we see is an attempt to deter immigrant families from accessing benefits. This new public charge policy is intended to force families to choose between\u00a0applying for a green card, even now or in the future, or accessing basic needs that they need,\u00a0like health, like food, rent, and healthcare. And we know that the consequences are severe,\u201d stated Cadena.<\/p>\n

California steps in<\/h2>\n

The state of California is stepping in, said Daniel Torres, Chief Equity Officer & Special Counsel at California Health and Human Services. He noted that the state plans to provide information through trusted messengers, including community-based organizations, faith leaders, schools and workers with the Women, Infants and Children program. California is also aiming to connect families with state-funded legal services.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe biggest challenge is that the chilling effect reaches entire families, including U.S. citizens in mixed-status households,\u201d he said. Torres cited the case of a mother who is undergoing chemotherapy, but is afraid to enroll in Medi-Cal because of fears of impacting her family\u2019s eligibility for legal permanent residency.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe vagueness and discretion in this rule means that when someone has an adverse decision, it may not be transparent which factor led to that denial. It could take years for us to really understand how this rule is being implemented,\u201d said Torres.<\/p>\n

Faith Community<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/picture>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

Cheryl Branch, Executive Director of Los Angeles Metropolitan Churches, explains how her organization is ensuring that people who are affected by the new public charge rule get the nutrition, healthcare and financial support they need to survive.<\/em><\/p>\n

The faith-based community is also stepping in to fill gaps for people who have already dropped off benefits because of fear of invoking public charge, said Cheryl Branch, executive director of Los Angeles Metropolitan Churches. \u201cWe\u2019re helping with rides to dialysis, prescription copays, blood pressure cuffs. Food pantries, cooking programs, home cooking. Food is front line.<\/p>\n

The Black diaspora is often left out of conversations on public charge, but they are no less impacted, said Branch, noting that roughly 22% of the population served by the churches in her network are from diaspora communities. These include immigrants from Nigeria, Belize, Ethiopia, Jamaica, Haiti, South America, and Kenya.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor us, public charge is a community story, not just an immigration story,\u201d stated Branch.<\/p>\n

Several of the speakers encouraged people to consult with attorneys before dropping off benefits. A list of nonprofit organizations qualified to assist individuals is available on the California Department of Social Services\u00a0website<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

SUNITA SOHRABJ<\/a>I<\/h2>\n

ACoM Health Editor Sunita Sohrabji is a veteran reporter, most recently covering the Indian American community for India-West newspaper. She has received 15 local and national awards for excellence in journalism.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BySunita Sohrabji Sep 16, 2026 California...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ca-local"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=83994"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83994\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83995,"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83994\/revisions\/83995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=83994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=83994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lapost.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=83994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}